A phase 3, single-arm, open-label study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, V114, in a 3+1 regimen in healthy infants in South Korea (PNEU-PED-KOR).

There is an ongoing burden of pneumococcal disease in children despite the use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs). This phase 3, open-label, single-arm, multisite, descriptive study was designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a 3 + 1 regimen of V114 (VAXNEUVANCE™), a 15-valent PCV, in South Korean infants and toddlers. Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 14 d following any vaccination, and throughout the study period for serious AEs. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) response rates (proportion of participants meeting an IgG threshold value of ≥0.35 µg/mL) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for the 15 serotypes at 30 d postdose 3 (PD3) and at 30 d postdose 4 (PD4) were evaluated as endpoints. Healthy infants enrolled at 42-90 d after birth were vaccinated with V114 (N = 57). The most commonly reported AEs were those solicited in the trial. The majority of reported AEs were transient and of mild or moderate intensity. Few serious AEs were reported; none were vaccine related. No participants died nor discontinued the study vaccine because of an AE. V114 was immunogenic for all 15 serotypes contained in the vaccine, as assessed by IgG response rates at 30 d PD3 and IgG GMCs at 30 d PD3 and at 30 d PD4. V114 was well tolerated and immunogenic when administered as a 3 + 1 regimen in healthy South Korean infants and toddlers.

Despite the use of pneumococcal vaccines, the burden of pneumococcal disease in children persists. V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, was immunogenic and well-tolerated in healthy South Korean infants and toddlers.

A phase 4, open-label study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib in children previously vaccinated with DTaP2-HBV-IPV-Hib or DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib (V419-016).

DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib (Vaxelis®) is a hexavalent combination vaccine (HV) indicated in infants and toddlers for the prevention of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis, and invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenzae type b. Switching between HVs during the childhood vaccination series is sometimes necessary due to, for example, vaccine availability, health-care provider preference, and/or tender awards. The purpose of this study was to describe the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a booster dose of Vaxelis® in participants who previously received a primary infant series of either DTaP2-HBV-IPV-Hib (Hexyon®) or Vaxelis®. Healthy participants approximately 11-13 months of age who previously received a two-dose primary series of Hexyon® (HHV group) or Vaxelis® (VVV group) all received a Vaxelis® booster dose. Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring antibody levels to individual vaccine antigens approximately 30 days following booster vaccination. Safety was evaluated as the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). The proportions of participants with antibody-specific responses for antigens contained in both Vaxelis® and Hexyon® at 30 days post-toddler-booster vaccination with Vaxelis® were comparable between groups, and higher in the VVV group for Vaxelis® antigens PRN and FIM2/3. The overall proportions of participants with AEs were generally comparable between groups. Following a booster dose of Vaxelis®, immune responses were comparable between groups for all shared antigens, and higher in the VVV group for antigens found only in Vaxelis®. The booster was well tolerated in both groups. These data support the use of Vaxelis® as a booster in mixed HV regimens.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V114, a 15-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine, in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients (PNEU-STEM).

BACKGROUND: Individuals who receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) are immunocompromised and at high risk of pneumococcal infections, especially in the months following transplant. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of V114 (VAXNEUVANCE; Merck, Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA), a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), when given to allo-HCT recipients. METHODS: Participants received 3 doses of V114 or PCV13 (Prevnar 13; Wyeth LLC) in 1-month intervals starting 3-6 months after allo-HCT. Twelve months after HCT, participants received either PNEUMOVAX 23 or a fourth dose of PCV (if they experienced chronic graft vs host disease). Safety was evaluated as the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) for all V114 serotypes in each vaccination group. RESULTS: A total of 274 participants were enrolled and vaccinated in the study. The proportions of participants with AEs and serious AEs were generally comparable between intervention groups, and the majority of AEs in both groups were of short duration and mild-to-moderate intensity. For both IgG GMCs and OPA GMTs, V114 was generally comparable to PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes, and higher for serotypes 22F and 33F at day 90. CONCLUSIONS: V114 was well tolerated in allo-HCT recipients, with a generally comparable safety profile to PCV13. V114 induced comparable immune responses to PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes, and was higher for V114 serotypes 22F and 33F. Study results support the use of V114 in allo-HCT recipients. Clinical Trials Registration. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03565900) and European Union at EudraCT 2018-000066-11.

A phase 3 study of safety and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, in children with HIV.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of V114 [15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) containing serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9 V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 22F, 23F, 33F], followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) 8 weeks later, in children with HIV. DESIGN: This phase 3 study (NCT03921424) randomized participants 6-17 years of age with HIV (CD4 + T-cell count ≥200 cells/µl, plasma HIV RNA <50 000 copies/ml) to receive V114 or 13-valent PCV (PCV13) in a double-blind manner on Day 1, followed by PPSV23 at Week 8. METHODS: Adverse events (AEs), pneumococcal serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG), and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) were evaluated 30 days after each vaccination. RESULTS: The proportion of participants experiencing at least one AE post-PCV was 78.8% in the V114 group ( n  = 203) and 69.6% in the PCV13 group ( n  = 204); respective proportions post-PPSV23 were 75.4% ( n  = 203) and 77.2% ( n  = 202). There were no vaccine-related serious AEs. IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and OPA geometric mean titers (GMTs) were generally comparable between V114 and PCV13 for shared serotypes at Day 30, and were higher for V114 compared with PCV13 for the additional V114 serotypes 22F and 33F. Approximately 30 days after PPSV23, IgG GMCs and OPA GMTs were generally comparable between the V114 and PCV13 groups for all 15 serotypes in V114. CONCLUSIONS: In children with HIV, a sequential administration of V114 followed 8 weeks later with PPSV23 is well tolerated and induces immune responses for all 15 pneumococcal serotypes included in V114.

A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the interchangeability of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and PCV13 with respect to safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in healthy infants (PNEU-DIRECTION).

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal disease (PD) remains a major health concern globally. In children, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) provide protection against PD from most vaccine serotypes, but non-vaccine serotypes contribute to residual disease. V114 is a 15-valent PCV containing all 13 serotypes in Prevnar 13™ (PCV13) and public health important serotypes 22F and 33F. This phase 3 study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of mixed PCV13/V114 regimens using a 3 + 1 dosing schedule when changing from PCV13 to V114 at doses 2, 3, or 4. METHODS: 900 healthy infants were randomized equally to 5 intervention groups. PCVs were administered in a 3-dose infant series at 2, 4, and 6 months of age followed by a toddler dose at 12-15 months along with concomitant routine vaccines. Safety was evaluated as the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the 15 serotypes in V114 were measured at 30 days post-dose 3 and 30 days post-dose 4 (PD4). RESULTS: Frequencies of injection-site and systemic AEs were generally comparable across all intervention groups. At 30 days PD4 (primary endpoint), IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for the 13 shared serotypes were generally comparable between mixed V114/PCV13 and 4-dose regimens of PCV13 or V114. In mixed regimens at 30 days PD4, a toddler dose of V114 was sufficient to achieve IgG GMCs comparable to a 4-dose regimen of V114 for serotype 22F, while at least one infant dose was needed in addition to the toddler dose to achieve IgG GMCs comparable to a 4-dose regimen of V114 for serotype 33F. CONCLUSIONS: V114 was well tolerated with a generally comparable safety profile to PCV13. For 13 shared serotypes, both mixed regimens and the V114 4-dose regimen induced generally comparable antibody responses to 4-dose regimen with PCV13. Study results support interchangeability of V114 with PCV13 in infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03620162; EudraCT: 2018-001151-12.

Demonstration of durable hepatitis B immune memory in children vaccinated with a DTaP5-IPV-HepB-Hib infant-toddler series 7 to 8 years previously.

Vaccination against hepatitis B (HepB) provides long-term protection against infection. This is despite a reduction in HepB surface antibody (anti-HBs) concentrations over time to levels below the well-accepted correlate of protection of ≥10 mIU/mL. Continued evidence of immune memory and protection despite declined anti-HBs concentrations can be demonstrated by HepB virus surface antigen challenge studies. Long-term immune memory and protection against HepB infection has not been demonstrated previously for the pediatric hexavalent vaccine DTaP5-IPV-HepB-Hib. This phase 3, multicenter, single-group, open-label challenge study (NCT04490499; EudraCT: 2020-000126-26) evaluated immune memory against HepB infection in children who had received DTaP5-IPV-HepB-Hib at 2, 4, and 11-12 months of age, or at 2, 3, 4, and 12 months of age. At age 8-9 years, they were each challenged with 5 µg of monovalent HepB vaccine. Anti-HBs levels were measured on pre-challenge day 1 and post-challenge day 30. At baseline, 45.4% (93 of 205) had anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL. On post-challenge day 30, 99.5% (201 of 202) had anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL, regardless of initial vaccination schedule. Post-challenge, geometric mean concentrations increased 71-fold over baseline and 96.0% of children had a ≥4-fold rise in anti-HBs concentrations with similar results across both dosing schedules. The challenge dose was well tolerated. The robust anti-HBs responses after a single 5-µg dose of HepB vaccine confirm the persistence of a HepB immune memory and demonstrate that DTaP5-IPV-HepB-Hib provides long-term protection against HepB.

Protective immune responses against Haemophilus influenza type b elicited by a fully-liquid DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine (VAXELIS™).

BACKGROUND: DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB is a fully-liquid, hexavalent combination vaccine (Vaxelis™) approved for vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B, and invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). Hib capsular polysaccharide, polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP), is conjugated to Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein complex (OMPC). Safety and immunogenicity of DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB were evaluated in 6 Phase III clinical studies including > 5,200 children. Studies included vaccination schedules in the United States (2, 4, 6 months of age) and Europe (2, 3, 4, 12 months of age and 2,4,11-12 months of age). METHODS: Data pertaining to anti-PRP responses of DTaP-IPV-Hib-Hep B compared to control vaccines from 5 Phase III studies are summarized. RESULTS: Post-infant series, the percentage of participants that achieved protective antibody thresholds for PRP (anti-PRP titer ≥ 0.15 µg/mL and ≥ 1.0 µg/mL, respectively) were higher in DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB recipients compared to recipients who received control vaccines. A high level of protective responses (96.6% at ≥ 0.15 µg/mL [95% CI:94.8, 97.9%]; 72.9% at ≥ 1.0 µg/mL [95% CI:69.2,76.4%]) were seen post-dose 2 of the 2 + 1 vaccination schedule and met superiority criteria over comparator, p-value < 0.001. In the same schedule, prior to administration of the toddler dose (in the second year of life), anti-PRP titers were higher in DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB recipients (91.4% at ≥ 0.15 µg/mL; 46.8% at ≥ 1.0 µg/mL) as compared to recipients who received control vaccines (63.4% at ≥ 0.15 µg/mL; 17.1% at ≥ 1.0 µg/mL). One-month post-toddler dose, high levels of anti-PRP titers were achieved in both DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB recipients (99.8% at ≥ 0.15 µg/mL; 96.6% at ≥ 1.0 µg/mL) and recipients who received control vaccines (99.5% at ≥ 0.15 µg/mL; 94.9% at ≥ 1.0 µg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: These results support that DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB induces a robust and sustained early Hib response. During the high-risk period for Hib disease after the infant vaccine and prior to the toddler dose; >90% of recipients maintained superior protective anti-PRP levels compared to control.

Safety and immunogenicity of a fully-liquid DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine (Vaxelis™) in premature infants.

Background: Immune immaturity may put premature infants at increased risk for infections. DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine (Vaxelis™), a hexavalent vaccine studied in >6,800 children, has acceptable safety and immunogenicity profiles generally similar to control vaccines. Here we evaluate safety and immunogenicity of DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine in premature infants. Methods: Premature infants were identified using prior medical conditions terms "premature baby/delivery" and/or "low birth weight baby". Immunogenicity and safety data were summarized across one Phase II and four Phase III randomized, active-comparator-controlled clinical trials (Protocol 004 in Canada [Control: PENTACEL™]; Protocols 005 and 006 in the US [Control: PENTACEL™]; and Protocols 007 and 008 in the EU [Control: INFANRIX™ hexa]) and one Phase III clinical trial in the UK (PRI01C); no formal statistical comparisons were performed. Results: Overall, 160 infants were considered premature (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB = 111 Control = 49). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) for DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB was comparable between overall and premature populations for all AEs days 1-15 postvaccination (Overall = 96.3%; Premature = 97.3%;), solicited injection-site AEs days 1-5 postvaccination (Overall = 84.1%; Premature = 75.5%), and solicited systemic AEs days 1-5 postvaccination (Overall = 93.7%; Premature = 94.5%). A high percentage of premature infants mounted protective immune responses to antigens contained in DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine. Response rates in preterm infants for all antigens (80-99%) were in a similar range to all infants (80-99%) for both DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB and control vaccines. Conclusions: DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine has a low incidence of AEs, an acceptable safety profile, and elicited satisfactory immune responses in premature infants comparable to the overall study population. These findings support vaccination with DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine in healthy premature infants.

Long-term risk of hepatocellular carcinoma mortality in 23220 hospitalized patients treated with micafungin or other parenteral antifungals.

BACKGROUND: Liver tumours observed in rats exposed to micafungin led to a black box warning upon approval in Europe in 2008. Micafungin's risk for liver carcinogenicity in humans has not been investigated. We sought to describe the risk of fatal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among persons who received micafungin and other parenteral antifungals (PAFs) with up to 12 years of follow-up. METHODS: We assembled a US multicentre cohort of hospitalized patients who received micafungin or other PAFs between 2005 and 2012. We used propensity score (PS) matching on patient characteristics from electronic medical records to compare rates of HCC mortality identified through the National Death Index though to the end of December 2016. We computed HRs and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 40110 patients who received a PAF were identified; 6903 micafungin recipients (87% of those identified) were successfully matched to 16317 comparator PAF users. Ten incident HCC deaths, one in the micafungin-exposed group and nine among comparator PAF users, occurred in 71285 person-years of follow-up. The HCC mortality rate was 0.05 per 1000 person-years in micafungin patients and 0.17 per 1000 person-years in comparator PAF patients. The PS-matched HR for micafungin versus comparator PAF was 0.29 (95% CI 0.04-2.24). CONCLUSIONS: Both micafungin and comparator PAFs were associated with HCC mortality rates of <0.2 per 1000 person-years. Given the very low event rates, any potential risk for HCC should not play a role in clinical decisions regarding treatment with micafungin or other PAFs investigated in this study.

Short-term risk of liver and renal injury in hospitalized patients using micafungin: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although echinocandins are generally well tolerated, there is little information on the frequency with which renal and hepatic adverse effects occur during use of micafungin or other parenteral antifungal (PAF) agents in clinical practice. METHODS: MYCOS is a multicentre cohort study of adult and paediatric patients who received micafungin or other PAFs between 2005 and 2012 at seven tertiary care hospitals from six centres in the USA. PAF cohort controls were selected through propensity score (PS) matching to micafungin recipients using clinical characteristics, other treatments, procedures and hospital service where PAF treatment was initiated. Analysis was restricted to patients without chronic liver and kidney conditions at the time of cohort entry. Treatment-emergent hepatic and renal injury was documented by changes in liver enzymes or estimated glomerular filtration rate through 30 days following completion of PAF treatment. Comparisons were quantified using the HR from a proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: There were 2970 micafungin recipients PS matched to 6726 recipients of comparator PAFs. Balance was achieved in all baseline covariates between treatment groups. There were similar rates of hepatic injury (micafungin, 13 events per 100 patients and other PAF, 12 per 100; HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.86-1.14) and lower rates of renal injury (micafungin, 63 events per 100 patients and other PAF, 65 per 100; HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-0.99) for micafungin recipients versus PAF comparators. CONCLUSION: For a wide spectrum of underlying conditions, we observed no increase in liver injury by micafungin and possibly a reduced risk of renal dysfunction in comparison with other PAF medications.

Vaccination With Heterologous HIV-1 Envelope Sequences and Heterologous Adenovirus Vectors Increases T-Cell Responses to Conserved Regions: HVTN 083.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the breadth of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine-elicited immune responses or targeting conserved regions may improve coverage of circulating strains. HIV Vaccine Trials Network 083 tested whether cellular immune responses with these features are induced by prime-boost strategies, using heterologous vectors, heterologous inserts, or a combination of both. METHODS: A total of 180 participants were randomly assigned to receive combinations of adenovirus vectors (Ad5 or Ad35) and HIV-1 envelope (Env) gene inserts (clade A or B) in a prime-boost regimen. RESULTS: T-cell responses to heterologous and homologous insert regimens targeted a similar number of epitopes (ratio of means, 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .6-1.6; P = .91), but heterologous insert regimens induced significantly more epitopes that were shared between EnvA and EnvB than homologous insert regimens (ratio of means, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-5.7; P = .01). Participants in the heterologous versus homologous insert groups had T-cell responses that targeted epitopes with greater evolutionary conservation (mean entropy [±SD], 0.32 ± 0.1 bits; P = .003), and epitopes recognized by responders provided higher coverage (49%; P = .035). Heterologous vector regimens had higher numbers of total, EnvA, and EnvB epitopes than homologous vector regimens (P = .02, .044, and .045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that vaccination with heterologous insert prime boosting increased T-cell responses to shared epitopes, while heterologous vector prime boosting increased the number of T-cell epitopes recognized. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01095224.

From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Vaccination in adult patients on systemic therapy for psoriasis.

Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis often require systemic immunomodulatory medications that place them at risk for infection. Vaccination is a proven strategy to reduce infections. However, vaccination rates among patients with inflammatory autoimmune conditions, including psoriasis, remain low. We review the literature regarding vaccine-preventable illness and vaccinations commonly used in the United States in patients older than 18 years on immunosuppressive therapies that are used in the treatment of psoriasis. The medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation recommends that dermatologists counsel patients on updating vaccinations in accordance with recommendations of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices as any measures taken to prevent infection can increase the safety of immunomodulatory therapies.

Safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA-BN, IMVAMUNE) is emerging as a primary immunogen and as a delivery system to treat or prevent a wide range of diseases. Defining the safety and immunogenicity of MVA-BN in key populations is therefore important. METHODS: We performed a dose-escalation study of MVA-BN administered subcutaneously in 2 doses, one on day 0 and another on day 28. Twenty-four hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients were enrolled sequentially into the study, and vaccine or placebo was administered under a randomized, double-blind allocation. Ten subjects received vaccine containing 10(7) median tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) of MVA-BN, 10 subjects received vaccine containing 10(8) TCID50 of MVA-BN, and 4 subjects received placebo. RESULTS: MVA-BN was generally well tolerated at both doses. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were identified. Transient local reactogenicity was more frequently seen at the higher dose. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to Vaccinia virus (VACV) were elicited by both doses of MVA-BN and were greater for the higher dose. Median peak anti-VACV NAb titers were 1:49 in the lower-dose group and 1:118 in the higher-dose group. T-cell immune responses to VACV were detected by an interferon γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay and were higher in the higher-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: MVA-BN is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in HSCT recipients. These data support the use of 10(8) TCID50 of MVA-BN in this population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00565929.

A novel therapeutic cytomegalovirus DNA vaccine in allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurs within 6 months in 60-70% of cytomegalovirus-seropositive patients after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), mainly due to immunosuppression associated with the procedure. Pre-emptive antiviral therapy reduces incidence of cytomegalovirus disease but can be toxic. To reduce the potential for disease and subsequent need for such antiviral drugs, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a cytomegalovirus therapeutic DNA vaccine compared with placebo. METHODS: In this exploratory double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase 2 trial, up to 80 donor-recipient pairs and 80 unpaired recipients undergoing allogeneic HSCT were planned for enrolment at 16 transplant centres in the USA. Eligible recipients were cytomegalovirus-seropositive, 18-65 years old, without high-risk primary disease, T-cell depletion, previous vaccination for cytomegalovirus, or autoimmune diseases. We randomly allocated participants in both parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive a cytomegalovirus therapeutic DNA vaccine (TransVax; Vical, San Diego, CA, USA) or placebo before conditioning and at 1, 3, and 6 months after transplantation. The vaccine contains plasmids encoding cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B and phosphoprotein 65 formulated with poloxamer CRL1005 and benzalkonium chloride. Randomisation was done by sequential allocation based on Pocock and Simon's method, and stratified by site, donor-recipient HLA matching status, and donor's cytomegalovirus serostatus. The primary outcome was the occurrence rate of clinically significant viraemia resulting in initiation of cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy in the per-protocol assessable population. We assessed rates of adverse events in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine or placebo. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00285259. FINDINGS: We randomly allocated 108 participants (94 HSCT recipients and 14 paired donors) between June 29, 2006, and Dec 11, 2009. Enrolment of the paired arm was halted in February 2008 for logistical reasons. Safety was assessed in all participants; the efficacy population was restricted to 74 unpaired recipients. Groups were balanced for demographic and clinical variables. 19 (48%) of 40 vaccine recipients required cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy, compared with 21 (62%) of 34 controls (p=0·145). However, during follow-up vaccine significantly reduced the occurrence and recurrence of cytomegalovirus viraemia and improved the time-to-event for viraemia episodes compared with placebo. The vaccine was well-tolerated; only one participant discontinued after an allergic reaction. Incidence of common adverse events after HSCT (eg, graft-versus-host disease or secondary infections) did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: We show proof of concept for an immunotherapeutic cytomegalovirus vaccine (TransVax) for clinically significant viraemia in the HSCT setting. The reported safety and efficacy outcomes support further development in a phase 3 trial, notwithstanding a lack of significant reduction in the use of cytomegalovirus-specific antiviral therapy compared with placebo in this phase 2 trial. FUNDING: Vical and US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Effect of vaccination with modified vaccinia Ankara (ACAM3000) on subsequent challenge with Dryvax.

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of smallpox vaccination, the immunological correlates of protection are not fully understood. To investigate this question, we examined the effect of immunization with modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) on subsequent challenge with replication-competent vaccinia virus (Dryvax). METHODS: Dryvax challenge by scarification was conducted in 36 healthy subjects who had received MVA (n = 29) or placebo (n = 7) in a previous study of doses and routes of immunization. Subjects were followed up for clinical take, viral shedding, and immune responses. RESULTS: MVA administration attenuated clinical takes in 21 (72%) of 29 subjects, compared with 0 of 7 placebo recipients (P = .001). Attenuation was most significant in MVA groups that received 1 x 10(7) median tissue culture infective doses (TCID(50)) intradermally (P = .001) and 1 x 10(7) TCID(50) intramuscularly (P = .001). Both duration and peak titer of viral shedding were reduced in MVA recipients. Peak neutralizing antibody responses to vaccinia virus or MVA previously induced by MVA immunization were associated with attenuated takes (P = .02) and reduced duration (P = .001) and titer (P = .005) of viral shedding. CONCLUSIONS: MVA immunization results in clinical and virologic protection against Dryvax challenge. Protection is associated with prior induction of neutralizing antibodies to MVA or vaccinia virus. MVA administered intradermally has protective and immunologic responses similar to those of a 10-fold-higher dose given subcutaneously.

Safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara (ACAM3000): effect of dose and route of administration.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a clinical trial of the safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) to examine the effects of dose and route of administration. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy, vaccinia virus-naive subjects received 1 of 6 regimens of MVA (ACAM3000) or placebo consisting of 2 administrations given 1 month apart. RESULTS: MVA was generally well tolerated at all dose levels and by all routes. More pronounced local reactogenicity was seen with the intradermal and subcutaneous routes than with intramuscular administration. Binding antibodies to whole virus and neutralizing antibodies to the intracellular mature virion and extracellular enveloped virion forms of vaccinia virus were elicited by all routes of MVA administration and were greater for the higher dose by each route. Similar levels of neutralizing antibodies were seen at a 10-fold-lower dose given intradermally (1 x 10(7) median tissue culture infective doses [TCID(50)]), compared with responses after 1 x 10(8) TCID(50) given intramuscularly or subcutaneously. T cell immune responses to vaccinia virus were detected by an interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay but had no clear relationship to dose or route. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that intradermal immunization with MVA provides a dose-sparing effect by eliciting antibody responses similar in magnitude and kinetics to those elicited by the intramuscular or subcutaneous routes but at a 10-fold-lower dose.